Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is this still in progress? #386

Closed
computerlyrik opened this issue Nov 25, 2015 · 6 comments
Closed

Is this still in progress? #386

computerlyrik opened this issue Nov 25, 2015 · 6 comments

Comments

@computerlyrik
Copy link

Hey there!

I'd like to join forces. I need a resource setting up proxy hosts for me.

Is your 3.0-rewrite-intention still alive? How can i help out?

@miketheman
Copy link
Contributor

Hi there!

3.0 rewrite is very much the goal - I've had some slowdown in getting around to testing the centos/systemd stuff: #384

I'm already using the Ubuntu one in a production environment - and as long as you mentally remember that it's not /var/log/nginx/ - rather /var/log/nginx-`, things are ok.

There's still some stuff that needs to be figured out - as in how many more things cannot be placed inside the sites-enabled/ file and must be in the root resource.

Also, the rewrite takes the stance of "this cookbook should not be compiling nginx for you on every target server" - rather you should build & distribute binaries (packages!) out of the scope of running servers.

@scalp42
Copy link

scalp42 commented Nov 25, 2015

Piggy backing on @miketheman here, https://github.com/cubicdaiya/nginx-build is a great tool for this.

@miketheman
Copy link
Contributor

@scalp42 That's cool, hadn't seen that one. I'm more like to go with fpm-cookery, and modify a recipe with my flags like so: https://github.com/bernd/fpm-recipes/blob/master/nginx/recipe.rb

The resulting package can then be stuffed in a package repo, packagecloud, etc.

@miguelaferreira
Copy link

BTW I'm using the centos/systemd features of #384 in production as well

@miketheman
Copy link
Contributor

Closing this question in favor of the release tracking checklist.
Thanks!

@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented Apr 25, 2020

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 25, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants