You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is a follow-up of #1427 . If we decided live-updating is no longer needed, then we can just archive this.
@duytnguyendtn and @kecnry both wanted live-updates. Several different ways proposed: Up/down arrows, tab, enter, when lost focus.
@pllim prefers not to live-update at all unless we determine that performance will not be impacted when we stress-test the feature. See #1427 (comment)
I would not want the live update to kick in when I start modifying the value. It would be nice to have it when I click the arrows, but it is useful really only for Imviz where a jump of "1" is ok. A jump of "1" in Specviz is completely useless because it goes to a completely different region of the spectrum (e.g. the starting value is 1.234um, I click the arrow, it goes to 2um), so I do not think I would ever use the arrows there.
It would be nice to have the live update when tabbing to the next entry. Could this be an option?
Said that, I do not find a big overhead in, for example, tabbing twice and then hitting return. I guess I need to try with different science cases, but a non-live update looks good to me (for now).
This is a follow-up of #1427 . If we decided live-updating is no longer needed, then we can just archive this.
@duytnguyendtn and @kecnry both wanted live-updates. Several different ways proposed: Up/down arrows, tab, enter, when lost focus.
@pllim prefers not to live-update at all unless we determine that performance will not be impacted when we stress-test the feature. See #1427 (comment)
@camipacifici said the following at #1427 (comment) :
🐱
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: