You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It seems that the way the work-depth analysis for an SDFG was implemented, it is a destructive analysis (breaking loop cycles). I will indirectly fix this by transitioning the analysis into one that uses control flow lifting to perform the analysis on loop regions. This avoids the issue altogether. An intermediate quickfix is to create a deepcopy of the SDFG and performing analysis on that instead.
Describe the bug
Using
scope_work_depth()
on an SDFG with loops removes the backedges in the state machine.To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
out.sdfg
Expected behavior
scope_work_depth()
should not modify the passed SDFG.Screenshots
The SDFG on the left is the sample SDFG and the SDFG on right has been analysed with
scope_work_depth()
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: