-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 136
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Meta-issue: track Licensing for 3.0 #386
Comments
#82 is now closed |
Yes, #502 and #464 should be added to the list. As soon as the tech team, gets the core profile stabilized, we'll be doing another pass on the licensing profile, and these pending topics will be discussed. If a subteam wants to meet to discuss the licensing issues, in parallel, that would be welcome. |
@swinslow - Can you take a pass at this list and see if we got everything? |
@goneall Yes, thanks -- please see my edits in the tracking comment above, and in a number of the linked issues that I've commented on or closed. I believe everything is now addressed that is going to be addressed for 3.0. There are 4 issues noted above that are likely still to be discussed for 3.1 (though I'm not sure what the timeframe for 3.1 is expected to be, but leaving those open for now). I'm going to go ahead and close this tracker since it's keyed to 3.0, but feel free to re-open or let me know if you have any questions. |
This is a meta-issue to track all the licensing-related issues for the 3.0 spec release. Not all of these issues are agreed to be added to the spec; many require further discussion and consideration.
Comments on the issues below should be handled in the applicable threads, NOT in this meta-issue. Feel free to comment here re: issues that are missing from this tracking list.
Main issue
Fields for licensing profile
Obligations, Risks, Restrictions part of the software delivery in B2B case, closed / wontfix, see Obligations, Risks, Restrictions part of the software delivery in B2B case #111Adding attribute of distribution relevance at license findings / files / folders, closed / wontfix, see Adding attribute of distribution relevance at license findings / files / folders #92License expression syntax changes
Expand License namespaces available, closed / wontfix, see Expand License namespaces available #113Consider whether '+' should work for Exception IDs too, closed / wontfix, see Consider whether '+' should work for Exceptions IDs too #346License expression semicolon operator, closed / wontfix, see License expression semicolon operator #123Related: Multiple licenses: unclear specification, closed / wontfix, see Multiple licenses: unclear specification #124 (also License expression semicolon operator #123)Spec syntax / appendix changes
Rename SPDX-License-Identifier to SPDX-License-Expression?, no changes, see Rename SPDX-License-Identifier to SPDX-License-Expression? #82License List changes
Relationship / Annotation changes
Expand §8.3.4 Annotation Type with new values (LICENSE, PATENT, COPYRIGHT, EXPORT, TRADEMARK) and change cardinality, no changes for licensing-related fields, see Expand §8.3.4 Annotation Type with new values (LICENSE, PATENT, COPYRIGHT, EXPORT, TRADEMARK) and change cardinality #35License for SPDX data
Re-evaluating CC0-1.0 as DataLicense for SPDX 3.0, no changes, see Re-evaluating CC0-1.0 as DataLicense for SPDX 3.0 #159The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: