We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hi,
Apologies, no discussion tab so raising it as an issue. It could be that the name was 'corrected' in 1.1.0.
In version 0.0.9 the top of the METADATA file reads
Metadata-Version: 2.1 Name: swagger-ui-bundle Version: 0.0.9 Summary: swagger_ui_bundle - swagger-ui files in a pip package Home-page: https://github.com/dtkav/swagger_ui_bundle Author: Daniel Grossmann-Kavanagh
In 1.1.0 the top of the METADATA file reads
Metadata-Version: 2.1 Name: swagger_ui_bundle Version: 1.1.0 Summary: Swagger UI bundled for usage with Python Home-page: https://github.com/spec-first/swagger_ui_bundle License: Apache-2.0 Keywords: swagger-ui Author: Daniel Grossmann-Kavanagh
You can see the name of the 0.0.9 version is
swagger-ui-bundle
and the 1.1.0 name is
swagger_ui_bundle
The latter seeming to be more in keeping with the name of the package.
Tooling reads the metadata files to get information about the package and it took me a while to prove these are the same package.
Not a big issue, just wanted to be sure of what I was seeing. Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Hi,
Apologies, no discussion tab so raising it as an issue. It could be that the name was 'corrected' in 1.1.0.
In version 0.0.9 the top of the METADATA file reads
In 1.1.0 the top of the METADATA file reads
You can see the name of the 0.0.9 version is
swagger-ui-bundle
and the 1.1.0 name is
swagger_ui_bundle
The latter seeming to be more in keeping with the name of the package.
Tooling reads the metadata files to get information about the package and it took me a while to prove these are the same package.
Not a big issue, just wanted to be sure of what I was seeing. Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: