You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Originally posted by grantfitzsimmons December 19, 2024 Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. Although better sharing is still very much in-demand, queries can be shared via URL. Record sets cannot be shared effectively at all in Specify, instead requiring the user to either completely transfer ownership (which can be done as of #5367) or for the other user to recreate it themselves from scratch. You can view a record set from a direct URL link, but it is not quite the same.
Describe the solution you'd like
Users should be able to
Share a record set via URL with another user
Share a record set with other users via the "Record Set" menu
At a minimum, administrators should be able to share with all users.
Better yet, users should be able to select other users individually to grant shared access
Users without edit permission to a record set (accessed via URL or not shared) should not be able to add/remove items to it
Describe alternatives you've considered
Transferring ownership is a good first step, but users want to still have access to a record set after sharing it.
Sharing queries, record sets, and workbenches would be great!
Requested By: Matthew Cruz at University of Michigan
I have created recordsets in a few collections, and I want them to be visible for all users, not only for me, as they are now. How do I accomplish that? I prefer to do it directly in the database if that is possible.
Just don’t know what column (spPrincipalID? GroupPermissionLevel?) to set to what.
Requested By: Chris at Gothenburg museum of natural history
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Discussed in #5504
Originally posted by grantfitzsimmons December 19, 2024
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Although better sharing is still very much in-demand, queries can be shared via URL. Record sets cannot be shared effectively at all in Specify, instead requiring the user to either completely transfer ownership (which can be done as of #5367) or for the other user to recreate it themselves from scratch. You can view a record set from a direct URL link, but it is not quite the same.
Describe the solution you'd like
Users should be able to
Describe alternatives you've considered
Transferring ownership is a good first step, but users want to still have access to a record set after sharing it.
Reported By
#256 (comment)
#256 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: