Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

spm3.x 不为seajs服务啊？ 下载的包不是cmd的，要自己改造吗？ spm2.0用惯了！！ #120

Closed
honger05 opened this issue Mar 6, 2015 · 8 comments
Closed

spm3.x 不为seajs服务啊？ 下载的包不是cmd的，要自己改造吗？ spm2.0用惯了！！ #120

honger05 opened this issue Mar 6, 2015 · 8 comments

Comments

@honger05
Copy link

honger05 commented Mar 6, 2015

No description provided.

@popomore
Copy link
Member

popomore commented Mar 6, 2015

构建成 cmd 的

@afc163
Copy link
Member

afc163 commented Mar 6, 2015

源码是 CommonJS 的。

spmjs/spm#819
http://segmentfault.com/q/1010000002466503

@honger05
Copy link
Author

honger05 commented Mar 6, 2015

spm2.x会被关掉吗？

@popomore
Copy link
Member

popomore commented Mar 6, 2015

有问题还是会修复的

@honger05
Copy link
Author

honger05 commented Mar 6, 2015

" 所以，是的，使用 spm3 可以而且推荐不使用 seajs 。"

那我想使用seajs，是不是用spm2好一些呢？

正如seajs官网说的，使用spm2构建工具，合并打包等功能。spm build就能发布到本地dist目录。
而spm3 使用spm build命令则要发布到源上，我并不想发布到源上。因为我想要的是像grunt一样的合并打包工具。

@popomore
Copy link
Member

popomore commented Mar 6, 2015

build 不会发源。。。2/3 都支持构建成 CMD，不知道你具体遇到什么问题？

@honger05
Copy link
Author

honger05 commented Mar 6, 2015

请教一个问题，比如我用seajs做项目，我现在想用backbone，我用spm2拿下来的backbone已经改造成cmd的了，直接就能用。
image

而我用spm3拿下来的，需要自己手动改造。这样是不是说我用spm2更适合做seajs的项目呢？
image

@afc163
Copy link
Member

afc163 commented Mar 6, 2015

http://sorrycc.gitbooks.io/spm-handbook/content/develop-package/README.html

@afc163 afc163 closed this as completed Mar 14, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@popomore @afc163 @honger05