Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 16, 2018. It is now read-only.

Consider Javers as Java diff'ing option #5

Open
habuma opened this issue Oct 24, 2014 · 2 comments
Open

Consider Javers as Java diff'ing option #5

habuma opened this issue Oct 24, 2014 · 2 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@habuma
Copy link
Contributor

habuma commented Oct 24, 2014

I've received several recommendations to use Javers instead of java-diff-utils for producing differences between Java objects. This should be considered for M2.

@habuma habuma added this to the 1.0.0.M2 milestone Oct 24, 2014
@habuma habuma self-assigned this Oct 24, 2014
@SQiShER
Copy link

SQiShER commented Nov 19, 2014

Hi there!

I just stumbled over this issue and just wanted to throw java-object-diff into the mix, in case you haven't seen it yet. It's very lightweight, actively maintained and may be a good fit. Feel free to contact me, if you have any questions about it.

Cheers!

@eliezio
Copy link

eliezio commented Mar 31, 2016

Since Javers doesn't provide the required reverse operation (Patch/Merge), the java-object-diff library from SQiShER seems to be a better candidate to replace java-diff-utils.

@SQiShER: wouldn't be better if you open a separate issue proposing your java-object-diff library including an executive summary showing the main advantages against the (now abandoned) java-diff-utils?

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants