You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 8, 2023. It is now read-only.
Firstly, thanks for you contribution of mia, which is a very well-structured and concise implementation of the model inference attack.
However, one thing confuses me is that, in your cifar10 example, line 150-152, you include (x_test, y_test) into the dataset for testing the attacker, which is used for training the shadow model. For my perspective, this is inappropriate since the attack model has already seen these data indirectly through the shadow models, which breach the assumption that the testing is unseen before.
Firstly, thanks for you contribution of mia, which is a very well-structured and concise implementation of the model inference attack.
However, one thing confuses me is that, in your cifar10 example, line 150-152, you include (x_test, y_test) into the dataset for testing the attacker, which is used for training the shadow model. For my perspective, this is inappropriate since the attack model has already seen these data indirectly through the shadow models, which breach the assumption that the testing is unseen before.
In the official implementation https://github.com/csong27/membership-inference, they seem to avoid this by separating one more testing set out.
I don not know whether my understanding is correct.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: