Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Reduce likelyhood of binding errors by making LogCorrelationPropertySource an EnumerablePropertySource #38349

Closed
philwebb opened this issue Nov 13, 2023 · 0 comments
Closed

Reduce likelyhood of binding errors by making LogCorrelationPropertySource an EnumerablePropertySource #38349

philwebb opened this issue Nov 13, 2023 · 0 comments
Assignees
@philwebb
Labels
type: task A general task
Milestone
3.2.0

Comments

@philwebb
Copy link
Member

philwebb commented Nov 13, 2023 •
edited
Loading

As discovered in #38201 we're likely to get less binder errors if LogCorrelationPropertySource is an EnumerablePropertySource.
@philwebb philwebb self-assigned this Nov 13, 2023
@philwebb philwebb added the type: task A general task label Nov 13, 2023
@philwebb philwebb modified the milestones: 3.1.x, 3.2.x Nov 13, 2023
@philwebb philwebb changed the title Reduce likelyhood of binding errors by making LogCorrelationPropertySource and IterablePropertySource Reduce likelyhood of binding errors by making LogCorrelationPropertySource and EnumerablePropertySource Nov 13, 2023
@philwebb philwebb modified the milestones: 3.2.x, 3.2.0 Nov 13, 2023
@wilkinsona wilkinsona changed the title Reduce likelyhood of binding errors by making LogCorrelationPropertySource and EnumerablePropertySource Reduce likelyhood of binding errors by making LogCorrelationPropertySource an EnumerablePropertySource Nov 13, 2023
@wilkinsona wilkinsona mentioned this issue Dec 5, 2023
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@philwebb philwebb

Labels
type: task A general task
Projects
None yet
Milestone
3.2.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@philwebb