You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
EhCache 3.0 lives in a different package namespace and has a quite different API from classic EhCache. Due to its redesign and repurposing as a JCache provider (which is built into EhCache 3.0 out of the box now), it's probably best to focus on compatibility with it as a provider behind Spring's JCache support. This means that there won't be an org.springframework.cache.ehcache equivalent for it.
This issue tracks our efforts to provide compatibility with it, optionally running parts of our test suite against it etc.
As of Spring Framework master in late March 2015, a basic note has been added to the package javadoc of org.springframework.cache.ehcache, and JCacheEhCacheTests has been fine-tuned to work with either the traditional ehcache-jcache module or ehcache-3.0.0.m1 (through a simple switch in our build script).
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Juergen Hoeller opened SPR-12847 and commented
EhCache 3.0 lives in a different package namespace and has a quite different API from classic EhCache. Due to its redesign and repurposing as a JCache provider (which is built into EhCache 3.0 out of the box now), it's probably best to focus on compatibility with it as a provider behind Spring's JCache support. This means that there won't be an
org.springframework.cache.ehcache
equivalent for it.This issue tracks our efforts to provide compatibility with it, optionally running parts of our test suite against it etc.
Issue Links:
Referenced from: commits 26d4f91
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: