Help wanted?

[rjokelai]

Hi @4kimov, I would be interested in helping the JS version come alive. Anything I could do?

[4kimov]

@rjokelai Thanks for pinging. Sure, there's plenty you can do -- the rough code is there, what's missing is proper linting, formatting, making all the scripts work properly, optimizations, packaging it properly, etc. Gave you access if you'd like to give it a go.

[rjokelai]

Thank you. Do you have any guidelines that you want to enforce across the implementations or am I free to do as I please here?

[4kimov]

The major things are to have identical tests across implementations (which is already done for the JS version). I'd recommend leaving the README as is for now (with the exception of removing the "work-in-progress" notice), and focusing on just making all the npm run scripts work + making Github Actions pass.

[jcbbb]

Hello, I was just trying out the package, and it does not support BigInt. What would be a good way to support this or there any plan to? It basically requires everything that returns Number be casted to BigInt for calculation parts. What do you think?

[4kimov]

Hello, thanks for the question. Let's move the discussion here: #4. No immediate plans to address this yet, but if you'd like to create a PR for it, I could review.

[mgred]

@4kimov what is the current state? Do you see anything (with priority) that needs to be done?

[4kimov]

There's nothing that's urgent on the JS package. It's missing bigint support, but other than that fully usable.