-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Memory leak 2.3.6-srh-extra #3
Comments
Hi @dr-diesel . Thank you for the report. Memory leaks like this one have been seen before, and I have had problems reproducing it and tracking it down. (In fact, I believe it's a faster version of a pre-existing memory leak in 2.3.6, but I'll need to double-check what the exact state of 2.3.6-srh-extra is.) Note that you can downgrade from 2.3.6-srh-extra back to 2.3.6 proper, in-place. |
Hi Sam @srh , I'm aware of possible downgrade, but we'll try to help figuring out the leak and possibly contribute. The IO improvement is significant. We have secondary-replica nodes not critical for production use, where memory-leak occurs and we can debug. Admin will try to create debug build for valgrind or similar tool to debug. |
@srh Tried to move primary replica from one node to another, which should have data as secondary replica. Huge spike of ram occured on secondary replica and crashed out of ram. Restarted node with most secondary replicas. It suddenly needed bunch of diskspace in datadir.. One table has significant differences in disk usages: secondary replica after out of diskspace shutdown: primary replica: |
Hello,
we migrated from official 2.3.6 to 2.3.6-srh-extra , released on Thu. IO went nicely down as expected, unfortunately large memory-leak occured
it doesn't happen (so much) on node having only 1 r/w intensive table - primary replica. Removed secondary replicas, so the usage went down.
other nodes having multiple primary/secondary replicas keeps rising in memory usage since deploy
Build is made from release https://github.com/srh/rethinkdb/releases/tag/v2.3.6-srh-extra +patch de5d96e .
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: