generated from obsidianmd/obsidian-sample-plugin
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 184
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[BUG] Card decks aren't completely randomized #514
Labels
bug
Something isn't working
Comments
Hey @putzwasser I've implemented some relevant enhancements and would appreciate feedback before I request @st3v3nmw to merge into the official release. Details are at: One appropriate setting would be: Cheers |
Hi @putzwasser the fix has been included in the latest release 1.11.0. Please close this at your convenience. Cheers |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Describe the bug
I turned on the setting
RANDOMIZE_CARD_ORDER: "Randomize card order during review?"
. I thought obsidian-SR would shuffle all individual cards in a deck, but it does not. I guess, it just fetches a random note containing flashcards, but it presents all flashcards of a specific note.To Reproduce
RANDOMIZE_CARD_ORDER: "Randomize card order during review?"
Expected behavior
It would be better if the deck would be shuffled on a per flashcard basis and not a per note that contain flashcard basis.
Maybe a second option would be best to suit everybodies needs
Additional context
I write notes as atomic as i can. Then I create a separate flashcard note. I add clozes and q&a to that flashcard note. Some questions are variations of the clozes or other questions. But in general the flashcards' contents are very related.
Seeing the clozes and then immediately the questions defeats the purpose.
Being asked multiple questions about the same topic is very boring and I guess it woudl enhance learning if you'd be asked the questions not in a straight row.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: