Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BUG] Card decks aren't completely randomized #514

Open
putzwasser opened this issue Oct 15, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

[BUG] Card decks aren't completely randomized #514

putzwasser opened this issue Oct 15, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@putzwasser
Copy link

Describe the bug
I turned on the setting RANDOMIZE_CARD_ORDER: "Randomize card order during review?". I thought obsidian-SR would shuffle all individual cards in a deck, but it does not. I guess, it just fetches a random note containing flashcards, but it presents all flashcards of a specific note.

To Reproduce

  1. Turn on RANDOMIZE_CARD_ORDER: "Randomize card order during review?"
  2. Create a deck with some notes that contain multiple flashcards each
  3. Get presented all flashcards of a specific note in a row

Expected behavior
It would be better if the deck would be shuffled on a per flashcard basis and not a per note that contain flashcard basis.
Maybe a second option would be best to suit everybodies needs

Additional context
I write notes as atomic as i can. Then I create a separate flashcard note. I add clozes and q&a to that flashcard note. Some questions are variations of the clozes or other questions. But in general the flashcards' contents are very related.

Seeing the clozes and then immediately the questions defeats the purpose.
Being asked multiple questions about the same topic is very boring and I guess it woudl enhance learning if you'd be asked the questions not in a straight row.

@putzwasser putzwasser added the bug Something isn't working label Oct 15, 2022
@ronzulu
Copy link
Collaborator

ronzulu commented Oct 5, 2023

Hey there, this has been fixed but not yet formerly released. So keep an eye out.

@st3v3nmw I hadn't noticed that this was fixed as part of #751.

Do you want me to document that anywhere?

@ronzulu
Copy link
Collaborator

ronzulu commented Nov 5, 2023

Hey @putzwasser

I've implemented some relevant enhancements and would appreciate feedback before I request @st3v3nmw to merge into the official release.

Details are at:
#610 (comment)

One appropriate setting would be:
280527828-84471970-e2ea-4f6e-baf4-113e2028e8b8

Cheers
Ronny

@ronzulu
Copy link
Collaborator

ronzulu commented Jan 10, 2024

Hi @putzwasser the fix has been included in the latest release 1.11.0. Please close this at your convenience.

Cheers
Ronny

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants