You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Right now, stash-box allows adding an identical alias as the name. Since search and scraping already matches both, I feel like this is redundant clutter.
Describe the solution you'd like
Add validation for name field against aliases in the frontend.
Additional context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Also worth noting that Stash already prevents identical aliases. I've seen others mention this causing errors when trying to scrape from a Stash-Box into Stash, but I haven't run into it personally yet.
Filter chips look exactly the same as the incumbent chips, but they add a trailing drop down caret icon
This gives each chip the option to Set as primary name and Delete name
A name set as primary gets a unique chip presentation to stand out
Either a different colored chip
Or a chip with a leading icon, such as a star
This solves several issues with manual data entry such as the need for validation against duplicate aliases, and forgetting to re-add a primary name as an alias if the submitter is flipping primary names.
Alternate implementation
Thought of alternate implementation of the above without using a filter chip
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Right now, stash-box allows adding an identical alias as the name. Since search and scraping already matches both, I feel like this is redundant clutter.
Describe the solution you'd like
Add validation for name field against aliases in the frontend.
Additional context
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc5d5/fc5d54a08cc09f9980082cf7ba2d257ce1ea71f7" alt="image"
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: