-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
Finish docs on existing rustdoc #124
Comments
This documentation misses actually the syntax allowed in documentation comments. Ok, it does mention markdown, but the current rustdoc supports crosslinking methods, functions, traits, etc. It would be nice to document all of this because many projects are using these. |
Since when? |
Since as far as I can remember: https://rust-lang-nursery.github.io/stdsimd/x86_64/stdsimd/vendor/constant._MM_EXCEPT_DENORM.html There is a |
Right, but that's just markdown. Look at the source:
That's a manual link. Just markdown. |
Ah yes, sure. I was just saying that being able to create these links depends on how rustdoc currently creates the files (e.g. that it puts functions into |
This is effectively complete for our purposes here. Obviously the rustdoc book can be improved, but that's not a thing to track in this repo. |
I'm filing this issue here rather than on rust-lang/rust because it's more relevant to people on this repo, but https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/tree/master/src/doc/rustdoc is the docs for the old rustdoc, and we should fill it out so that we can determine if we're compatible with the older rustdoc, and how much.
Filling these out is important:
Marking this as "easy" because it mostly requires reading code, not writing it. I'm happy to elaborate a bit more about the details here if needed!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: