Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ContentType: Do we need IMAGE and AGENCY? #303

Open
bobaaaaa opened this issue Sep 29, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

ContentType: Do we need IMAGE and AGENCY? #303

bobaaaaa opened this issue Sep 29, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
❓question Further information is requested

Comments

@bobaaaaa
Copy link
Contributor

Is there a reason why both of them are main content types? In paper we ignore them completely.

enum ContentType {
// Not specified.
CONTENT_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED = 0;
// A text article.
ARTICLE = 1;
// An image article (not available as standalone article).
IMAGE = 2;
// A video article.
VIDEO = 3;
// A gallery article.
GALLERY = 4;
// An embed article including an oembed or edge_side_include element
EMBED = 5;
// An author article (not available as standalone article).
AUTHOR = 6;
// An agency article (not available as standalone article).
AGENCY = 7;
}

@bobaaaaa bobaaaaa added the ❓question Further information is requested label Sep 29, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
❓question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant