-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 920
Fix given displacement BC's of FEA solver and CElasticityMovement #658
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0a7a6be
delete columns of halo points on given displacement boundaries
pcarruscag 6eb57be
apply same fix to CElasticityMovement
pcarruscag 2f496ac
fix issue in CElasticityMovement, due to halo vertices not having cor…
pcarruscag 02d9354
revert travis
pcarruscag 3b7cab8
Merge branch 'develop' into fix_fea_disp_bc
rsanfer File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There are several places where you do a similar operation as to what is done here.. have you considered reusing something like StiffMatrix.DeleteValsRowi() or creating a new version that suits what you are doing here within the matrix class to save some code by calling it instead?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes definitely, especially since these operations can be performed more efficiently if the sparsity pattern is know. And there are other areas too, for example we currently add the contribution of the mass matrix to the stiffness matrix in a similar block by block way. But I would prefer to address all of those in one PR and avoid creating conflicts between ongoing PR's.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think creating a StiffMatrix.DeleteValsColi() would do the job. There is some room for code saving in all of this implementation, but I agree with @pcarruscag, that could be done in an additional PR.