Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 28, 2024. It is now read-only.

Should SCI clean up KSA <=> IAM principal bindings on namespace deletion? #179

Open
brandonjbjelland opened this issue Aug 10, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Should SCI clean up KSA <=> IAM principal bindings on namespace deletion? #179

brandonjbjelland opened this issue Aug 10, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@brandonjbjelland
Copy link
Contributor

Context: #171 (comment)
@brandonjbjelland brandonjbjelland mentioned this issue Aug 10, 2023
Merged
@samos123
Copy link
Contributor

GCP does not seem to have an atomatic way to add or remove a specific principal binding to a specific role. So updates should be kept to a minimum. There is a risk of overwriting someones IAM policy incorrect whenever we add or remove IAM policy bindings on GCP.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@samos123 @brandonjbjelland