-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 384
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: preserve rate limiters in memory across configuration reloads #1792
Conversation
The goal with this change is to persist the rate limiters across reloads with the least invasive changes possible. To do this I first added a LimiterOptions structure to hold the current set of rate limiters. I then identified each call of tollbooth.New and moved the construction of the limiter without modifications to options.go. I assigned each limiter a distinct field to be referenced during the API object creation. Next I needed to add an optional parameter to the NewAPI methods so I could store the new LimiterOptions onto the API object for reference during route construction. To do this without breaking all existing calls to NewAPI I used the options pattern. This makes the method accept a parametric set of values implementing a common interface, so future problems of similar nature can also be added as options. I then replaced all the local anonymous limiter.Limiters made inline within the API route construction with each corresponding newly added field within the LimiterOptions struct.
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 11244024882Details
💛 - Coveralls |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code changes look fine to me
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe change the title to say "preservation" or similar instead of "persistence." The latter to me sounds like its getting persisted somewhere (disk, database, etc.) when in fact this just preserves the values across config changes.
Titles are important as they show up in the changelog.
Also feel free to remove the headings from the PR description -- those are mostly to guide external contributors. |
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop* --- ## [2.163.0](v2.162.2...v2.163.0) (2024-10-15) ### Features * add mail header support via `GOTRUE_SMTP_HEADERS` with `$messageType` ([#1804](#1804)) ([99d6a13](99d6a13)) * add MFA for WebAuthn ([#1775](#1775)) ([8cc2f0e](8cc2f0e)) * configurable email and sms rate limiting ([#1800](#1800)) ([5e94047](5e94047)) * mailer logging ([#1805](#1805)) ([9354b83](9354b83)) * preserve rate limiters in memory across configuration reloads ([#1792](#1792)) ([0a3968b](0a3968b)) ### Bug Fixes * add twilio verify support on mfa ([#1714](#1714)) ([aeb5d8f](aeb5d8f)) * email header setting no longer misleading ([#1802](#1802)) ([3af03be](3af03be)) * enforce authorized address checks on send email only ([#1806](#1806)) ([c0c5b23](c0c5b23)) * fix `getExcludedColumns` slice allocation ([#1788](#1788)) ([7f006b6](7f006b6)) * Fix reqPath for bypass check for verify EP ([#1789](#1789)) ([646dc66](646dc66)) * inline mailme package for easy development ([#1803](#1803)) ([fa6f729](fa6f729)) --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please). Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
The goal with this change is to persist the rate limiters across reloads with the least invasive changes possible. To do this I first added a LimiterOptions structure to hold the current set of rate limiters. I then identified each call of tollbooth.New and moved the construction of the limiter without modifications to options.go. I assigned each limiter a distinct field to be referenced during the API object creation.
Next I needed to add an optional parameter to the NewAPI methods so I could store the new LimiterOptions onto the API object for reference during route construction. To do this without breaking all existing calls to NewAPI I used the options pattern. This makes the method accept a parametric set of values implementing a common interface, so future problems of similar nature can also be added as options.
I then replaced all the local anonymous limiter.Limiters made inline within the API route construction with each corresponding newly added field within the LimiterOptions struct.
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Feature
What is the current behavior?
Currently we do not persist rate limiters when the config is reloaded.
What is the new behavior?
We persist rate limiters in memory across configuration reloads.