You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In v2.2.53, this still seems suboptimal... Is there any reason we can't have a mode like automatic, but instead of expanding the area to a perimeter line, it simply expands to any line on the layer below (including an infill line).
That way, the area will never be expanded beyond the infill line spacing.
For some infill patterns, there might be certain angles where it is a long distance to the next infill line in the worst case. In that case, a different direction for the dense layer support should be chosen.
The algorithm seems simple on the surface, but I guess implementation is harder than it looks...
In v2.2.53, this still seems suboptimal... Is there any reason we can't have a mode like automatic, but instead of expanding the area to a perimeter line, it simply expands to any line on the layer below (including an infill line).
That way, the area will never be expanded beyond the infill line spacing.
For some infill patterns, there might be certain angles where it is a long distance to the next infill line in the worst case. In that case, a different direction for the dense layer support should be chosen.
The algorithm seems simple on the surface, but I guess implementation is harder than it looks...
Originally posted by @Hello1024 in #507 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: