fix: Fix rule merging without a match

[bebraw]

@just-jeb, Do you think there are other cases to cover or would this do? The fix was quite simple.

Closes #167.

[just-jeb]

@bebraw I'm not sure this is valid only for merge. What if options was array and I'd want to prepend it if there is a full match?
I'd still expect the entries in use to be appended and the options prepended when there is a match in loader.

[bebraw]

I'm not sure this is valid only for merge. What if options was array and I'd want to prepend it if there is a full match?
I'd still expect the entries in use to be appended and the options prepended when there is a match in loader.

Can you open another issue about that and what it should look like? As mentioned earlier, it might need another operator to avoid implicit behavior.

I think I'll merge and publish this one as it's a valid fix and that's a feature.

[just-jeb]

Thanks! Well, for my specific use case this fix is enough. I was just thinking about additional use cases that people might face.

[bebraw]

@just-jeb Sure, if you have time and you want, feel free to send examples as that helps a lot in thinking about these. 👍