Replies: 6 comments 3 replies
-
Yeah those are part of the plugin system that's still incomplete. I left them there to remind me to finish it. Yazi uses lua5.4 for now, no longer needing LuaJIT. Does it still need to apply patches? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I would need to check this. The problem used to be the vendored feature of Back to you when I've tested. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@sxyazi Indeed, it builds without patches and LuaJIT if I link it against lua-5.4 I'll update our package to 0.2.1 and remove the patch and LuaJIT dependency. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
If you don't mind, I have another minor question. I use Do you know why the last two releases don't exist on RSS? EDIT: Actually, it gets the dates right but, not the version 🤔 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
It's at the end, possibly because I modified the release before v0.2.0 after publishing - removed the mistakenly checked "Set as a pre-release" |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
warnings are cleared up now. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi,
NetBSD package maintainer here.
For some reason, I haven't looked further into it,
mlua
doesn't build on NetBSD when the vendored feature is enabled. So, I've patched it away and make it use the local copy ofLuaJIT2
.Given this, I would still like to let you know about the following build warnings.
System is NetBSD dev. version 10.99.10 using Rust-1.75.0
Regards,
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions