the slurp work incorrectly.

[JaydenFish]

SPC k s work incorrectly.
like this:
a = dict[2]
a= di()ct[[2]
a=di(ct)[2]
a=di(ct [2])

There is a needless space between 'ct [2]'.
Could you please repair this mistake?

[syl20bnr]

Since you are not in a lisp dialect, can you try the hybrid version SPC k s` (this is a backtick) ?

[JaydenFish]

This one is also incorrectly.
I want to use this function in C++ and python.
It's very useful.
Could please repair this mistake?

[StreakyCobra]

[...]
Could please repair this mistake?

---

[...]
Could please repair this mistake?

---

This is probably not a mistake as SPC k is made for the lisp language, not Python, so it's at most an enhancement or a feature request, not a mistake. Also if you want to see it corrected the soonest as possible, code contribution are always welcome https://github.com/syl20bnr/evil-lisp-state

[TheBB]

I get the expected behaviour by using sp-slurp-hybrid-sexp on SPC k s s ` s...

a = dict[2]
()a = dict[2]
(a) = dict[2]
(a = dict)[2]
(a = dict[2])

Note that you can't do SPC k ` s s s s... as that will call the hybrid function first and the regular one after that.

It sure would be nice if evil-lisp-state could "promote" the hybrid commands somehow in non-lisp modes so I didn't have to go to the backtick every time. Or perhaps enter an evil-hybrid-lisp-state on SPC k ` so I only had to use it the first time.

[syl20bnr]

It sure would be nice if evil-lisp-state could "promote" the hybrid commands somehow in non-lisp modes so I didn't have to go to the backtick every time. Or perhaps enter an evil-hybrid-lisp-state on SPC k ` so I only had to use it the first time.

Would be nice indeed.

[github-actions]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Please let us know if this issue is still valid!