You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I managed to get the desired result with Hash[results.map { |r| [ r.fetch_values('dimension1_name', 'dimension2_name'), r.fetch('measure_name')] }] but I feel like there is probably a better way. I am really liking the gem and thought adding an option like raw_sql_results: true or results_with_labels: false to the report object might be an option. Would you be opposed to a PR if I can make it work?
What would be the output in this "mode" if there's no dimensions defined in the report?
I wouldn't be against a PR to see how it would look, though perhaps this is better served in your app with via a decorator layer/utility class that does whatever formatting you want instead. This feels more like a very specific usecase for your implementation.
That said, I'm not sold on the naming. I feel there would be a better option name to describe what would come out of #result rather than results_with_labels ...
When running a report, is it possible to specify / control the format of the results that are returned?
By default I am getting;
{ measure_name => measure_value, dimension1_name => dimension1_value, dimension2_name => dimension2_value
I would like to get a "values only" output;
{ [dimension1_value, dimension2_value] => measure_value }
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: