Replies: 2 comments 3 replies
-
Is the process of directly feeding the table into tableGPT in the "quick start " tutorial the same as the processing flow in a completed RAG system for question answering (both involving the ColumnDocCompressor and inserting column embeddings into the query)? If that is the case, it indeed indicates that tableGPT2 performs poorly in non-table analysis tasks? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
That’s quite a broad topic, and many factors can affect the quality of the analyze results, especially when working with Excel datasets. Like what does your dataset look like, how is the quality of your input query, is your experiment setup correctly etc. We can't give you a precise answer without all the details. Regarding your second question, I’m not entirely clear on what you mean. Reading dataset files and performing RAG are two distinct steps in |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Is it true that tableGPT2 mainly focuses on table analysis tasks? I tested it on three of my own Excel files (with almost all non-numeric columns ) and only got two out of ten questions correct. Could this be due to the prompt? I have read the paper, and tableGPT2 should have excellent table understanding capabilities. Should I adjust the prompts when interacting with tableGPT2 so that it doesn't necessarily have to generate code (or even avoid generating code) to achieve good performance in pure text-based table question answering tasks?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions