[Feature Request] New Command -> Cycle Through AQS Searches

[FelipeRearden]

Hello @tadashi-aikawa !!!!!!!!!!!!!

Before we are back to business, let me update you. Forgive for my lack on interaction for the past months. I have been sick but I am finally getting back to normal :)

This way, I have new FRs :)

---

I have an idea that I would like to share with you.

I have been thinking about this for a long time and since we are gonna have a new AMAZING AQS search, I think is time to talk about this.

the idea is simple to explain: a new command that let the user CYCLE between selected AQS Searches when an AQS Modal is open in the screen.

● 100% Customazible by user: user define which AQS Search is gonna be cycle and the order.

● Multiple Cycle Commands: user can have more than one custom cycle and apply different hotkeys for each one of them.

Motivation

AQS is my vault hub. every navigation and search that I do inside my vault is from an AQS modal (there is one missing point that I am gonna talk to you in another FR).

This way, I have a bunch of AQS hotkeys to apply this workflow.

Let me show an example:

⭕️ For navigate/search content from the Active Note we have these AQS Modals:
⭘ Heading Search
⭘ In-file Search (in beta)
⭘ Backlink Search
⭘ Link Search

I have to define a different hotkey to each one of these AQS Modals

My FR is about a way to reduce these hotkeys to two:
1️⃣ Open an AQS Search (traditional Obsidian operation)

2️⃣ When the an AQS Search is open, a new hotkey that let me cycle between the AQS Searches (based on a user pre-defined order)

This way, we can make All AQS Searches integrated and dynamic

---

Thanks for reading this !!!!! I hope you like my suggestion 🙏 🙏 🙏

Let me know if you need more information !!!

Feels good to be back and to talk to you again :)

Have a great day 🌞

[tadashi-aikawa]

Thank you for your FR, @FelipeRearden :)

I have to define a different hotkey to each one of these AQS Modals

I understand your motivation. However, it seems redundant to cycle through since the type of search is determined before conducting a search🤔

[FelipeRearden]

Hello @tadashi-aikawa !!!

thank you very much for the reply. I saw your reply and I just wanna add a few comments to reply to you but my screen recording on iPad is nit working for some reason 😭

I am gonna try to solve this and I get back to you about his as soon as I can :)

[FelipeRearden]

I am gonna try to solve this and I get back to you about his as soon as I can :)

@tadashi-aikawa I am gonna wait for the release of version 10.0 to talk about this FR again. I wanna show this using the new AQS Search In File Search

Since I need my main vault (and not my test vault) to share with you my real workflow about this AQS Searches I rather wait a little bit.

This is the kind of FR that needs a real workflow to us to get the gist of it :)