|
| 1 | +/** |
| 2 | + * [2130] Maximum Twin Sum of a Linked List |
| 3 | + * |
| 4 | + * In a linked list of size n, where n is even, the i^th node (0-indexed) of the linked list is known as the twin of the (n-1-i)^th node, if 0 <= i <= (n / 2) - 1. |
| 5 | + * |
| 6 | + * For example, if n = 4, then node 0 is the twin of node 3, and node 1 is the twin of node 2. These are the only nodes with twins for n = 4. |
| 7 | + * |
| 8 | + * The twin sum is defined as the sum of a node and its twin. |
| 9 | + * Given the head of a linked list with even length, return the maximum twin sum of the linked list. |
| 10 | + * |
| 11 | + * Example 1: |
| 12 | + * <img alt="" src="https://assets.leetcode.com/uploads/2021/12/03/eg1drawio.png" style="width: 250px; height: 70px;" /> |
| 13 | + * Input: head = [5,4,2,1] |
| 14 | + * Output: 6 |
| 15 | + * Explanation: |
| 16 | + * Nodes 0 and 1 are the twins of nodes 3 and 2, respectively. All have twin sum = 6. |
| 17 | + * There are no other nodes with twins in the linked list. |
| 18 | + * Thus, the maximum twin sum of the linked list is 6. |
| 19 | + * |
| 20 | + * Example 2: |
| 21 | + * <img alt="" src="https://assets.leetcode.com/uploads/2021/12/03/eg2drawio.png" style="width: 250px; height: 70px;" /> |
| 22 | + * Input: head = [4,2,2,3] |
| 23 | + * Output: 7 |
| 24 | + * Explanation: |
| 25 | + * The nodes with twins present in this linked list are: |
| 26 | + * - Node 0 is the twin of node 3 having a twin sum of 4 + 3 = 7. |
| 27 | + * - Node 1 is the twin of node 2 having a twin sum of 2 + 2 = 4. |
| 28 | + * Thus, the maximum twin sum of the linked list is max(7, 4) = 7. |
| 29 | + * |
| 30 | + * Example 3: |
| 31 | + * <img alt="" src="https://assets.leetcode.com/uploads/2021/12/03/eg3drawio.png" style="width: 200px; height: 88px;" /> |
| 32 | + * Input: head = [1,100000] |
| 33 | + * Output: 100001 |
| 34 | + * Explanation: |
| 35 | + * There is only one node with a twin in the linked list having twin sum of 1 + 100000 = 100001. |
| 36 | + * |
| 37 | + * |
| 38 | + * Constraints: |
| 39 | + * |
| 40 | + * The number of nodes in the list is an even integer in the range [2, 10^5]. |
| 41 | + * 1 <= Node.val <= 10^5 |
| 42 | + * |
| 43 | + */ |
| 44 | +pub struct Solution {} |
| 45 | +use crate::util::linked_list::{to_list, ListNode}; |
| 46 | + |
| 47 | +// problem: https://leetcode.com/problems/maximum-twin-sum-of-a-linked-list/ |
| 48 | +// discuss: https://leetcode.com/problems/maximum-twin-sum-of-a-linked-list/discuss/?currentPage=1&orderBy=most_votes&query= |
| 49 | + |
| 50 | +// submission codes start here |
| 51 | + |
| 52 | +// Definition for singly-linked list. |
| 53 | +// #[derive(PartialEq, Eq, Clone, Debug)] |
| 54 | +// pub struct ListNode { |
| 55 | +// pub val: i32, |
| 56 | +// pub next: Option<Box<ListNode>> |
| 57 | +// } |
| 58 | +// |
| 59 | +// impl ListNode { |
| 60 | +// #[inline] |
| 61 | +// fn new(val: i32) -> Self { |
| 62 | +// ListNode { |
| 63 | +// next: None, |
| 64 | +// val |
| 65 | +// } |
| 66 | +// } |
| 67 | +// } |
| 68 | +impl Solution { |
| 69 | + pub fn pair_sum(head: Option<Box<ListNode>>) -> i32 { |
| 70 | + 0 |
| 71 | + } |
| 72 | +} |
| 73 | + |
| 74 | +// submission codes end |
| 75 | + |
| 76 | +#[cfg(test)] |
| 77 | +mod tests { |
| 78 | + use super::*; |
| 79 | + |
| 80 | + #[test] |
| 81 | + #[ignore] |
| 82 | + fn test_2130_example_1() { |
| 83 | + let head = linked![5, 4, 2, 1]; |
| 84 | + |
| 85 | + let result = 6; |
| 86 | + |
| 87 | + assert_eq!(Solution::pair_sum(head), result); |
| 88 | + } |
| 89 | + |
| 90 | + #[test] |
| 91 | + #[ignore] |
| 92 | + fn test_2130_example_2() { |
| 93 | + let head = linked![4, 2, 2, 3]; |
| 94 | + |
| 95 | + let result = 7; |
| 96 | + |
| 97 | + assert_eq!(Solution::pair_sum(head), result); |
| 98 | + } |
| 99 | + |
| 100 | + #[test] |
| 101 | + #[ignore] |
| 102 | + fn test_2130_example_3() { |
| 103 | + let head = linked![1, 100000]; |
| 104 | + |
| 105 | + let result = 100001; |
| 106 | + |
| 107 | + assert_eq!(Solution::pair_sum(head), result); |
| 108 | + } |
| 109 | +} |
0 commit comments