Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SPEC] Integrating new DKGs / Threshold protocols #626

Open
2 tasks
drewstone opened this issue Jun 5, 2023 · 0 comments
Open
2 tasks

[SPEC] Integrating new DKGs / Threshold protocols #626

drewstone opened this issue Jun 5, 2023 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@drewstone
Copy link
Contributor

drewstone commented Jun 5, 2023

Overview

If we were to integrate new threshold protocols (Threshold Schnorr DKG), is our system in a good place to extend these abstractions? How would we do so? What challenges might we face?

Checklist

  • Investigate the questions above
  • Identify if the architecture needs updating to support re-using as many primitives as possible (re-use the worker, signing manager, etc.)

Examples

  • Integrating t-Schnorr / t-BLS that generate different signatures, what would an integration path look like?
  • Integrating t-encryption DKG that generate encryptions instead of signatures, what would an integration path look like? Would the job scheduling system be useful here?
@drewstone drewstone converted this from a draft issue Jun 5, 2023
@drewstone drewstone moved this from Planning 🗺️ to Not Started 🕧 in Webb Universe Jun 8, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Not Started 🕧
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants