Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix(priority): use module instead of bit.band to keep order #2597

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 12, 2024
Merged

fix(priority): use module instead of bit.band to keep order #2597

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 12, 2024

Conversation

roggervalf
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

manast
manast reviewed Jun 8, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@manast manast left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Interesting. Didn't bit.band work as expected?

@roggervalf
Copy link
Collaborator Author

roggervalf commented Jun 8, 2024 •
edited
Loading

yeah, it didn't. That test fail with previous changes

@roggervalf roggervalf merged commit 9ece15b into master Jun 12, 2024
11 checks passed
@roggervalf roggervalf deleted the fix-priority-counter branch June 12, 2024 14:36
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2024
@semantic-release-bot
chore(release): 5.8.1 [skip ci]
16fb267 
## [5.8.1](v5.8.0...v5.8.1) (2024-06-12)

### Bug Fixes

* **priority:** use module instead of bit.band to keep order (python) ([#2597](#2597)) ([9ece15b](9ece15b))

### Features

* **queue:** add getCountsPerPriority method [python] ([#2607](#2607)) ([02b8338](02b8338))
@q1blue q1blue mentioned this pull request Jul 3, 2024
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@manast manast manast approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@roggervalf @manast