You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for maintaining this code and for fixing issue #103. I am impressed how well umxEFA solves problems with missing values and how it can do a factor analysis with more variables than observations. It takes hours to calculate in my case, even without the summary, but the result is perfect.
Anyway, two new bugs have appeared since last time:
umxEFA returns the data matrix rather than the loadings unless you specify loadings="model".
umxEFA does not work with rotation methods from GPArotation, e.g. quartimax. The error message says "Error in t.default(rm) : argument is not a matrix".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I pushed a commit to umxEFA last week so that it returns scores by default when requested (used to require user to also set return = "loadings") this and other edits might have fixed your issue. I'm can't replicate the issue with quartimax:
Could you return SEs of the scores as well? With the rubbish scales many of us have to use/analyze, the SEs can vary a lot, which has knock-on side effects of subsequent analyses of the factor scores.
Thanks for maintaining this code and for fixing issue #103. I am impressed how well umxEFA solves problems with missing values and how it can do a factor analysis with more variables than observations. It takes hours to calculate in my case, even without the summary, but the result is perfect.
Anyway, two new bugs have appeared since last time:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: