Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Can ToRawPrecision and ToRawFixed be made more deterministic? #123

Open
gibson042 opened this issue Jan 11, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Can ToRawPrecision and ToRawFixed be made more deterministic? #123

gibson042 opened this issue Jan 11, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
editorial Issue should be resolved in the spec future Out of scope for the current proposal

Comments

@gibson042
Copy link
Contributor

They currently require "solving" equations like x = a × 10b, which is cumbersome and obtuse. Adopting and extending tc39/ecma262#2471 would seem like a better approach.
@sffc
Copy link
Collaborator

sffc commented Jan 11, 2023

I did a bit of editorial work in this area in NFv3 to attempt to make the spec clearer to read and understand, but not necessarily implement.

I'd prefer to move this issue to ECMA-402 to resolve after NFv3 is merged in, since this can be done editorially.

@sffc sffc added the editorial Issue should be resolved in the spec label Jan 11, 2023
@sffc sffc added the future Out of scope for the current proposal label Jan 28, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
editorial Issue should be resolved in the spec future Out of scope for the current proposal
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@sffc @gibson042