You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Related to #537, I have been using AKHQ for a while and have noticed that there is no functionality to filter by multiple fields of a topic record simultaneously. There is a Search option which allows filtering by key and value using an AND operator. However, it is only allowed to search by a single literal in each field. It would be great if a multi-value search were implemented. So for example, a user could search in a topic with key {productId, storeId and date} for a record with productId = XXX AND date = XXX using something like productId=XXX && date=XXX by an additional search option apart from [EQUALS, CONTAINS, NOT CONTAINS]
What do you think about this feature? I can try to implement it, thanks in advance!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@JesusAparicioOrtiz the implementation (improved in #1538) already support multiple search patterns (based on a whitespace separator) but it applies an OR instead of a AND (in your request)
I agree it can be interesting to have flexibility and support both OR and AND but it can be tricky to implement 😄
Hello @tchiotludo !
Related to #537, I have been using AKHQ for a while and have noticed that there is no functionality to filter by multiple fields of a topic record simultaneously. There is a
Search
option which allows filtering by key and value using an AND operator. However, it is only allowed to search by a single literal in each field. It would be great if a multi-value search were implemented. So for example, a user could search in a topic with key {productId, storeId and date} for a record with productId = XXX AND date = XXX using something likeproductId=XXX && date=XXX
by an additional search option apart from [EQUALS, CONTAINS, NOT CONTAINS]What do you think about this feature? I can try to implement it, thanks in advance!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: