-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 72
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New Term - "caste" for eusocial organisms #412
Comments
Thanks @wcornwell for this submission and for using the new term template. It makes things super easy to assess. I would put the values you suggest in the Examples section. I have added the label "Process - need evidence for demand", because what is needed is not a general statement of who might be able to use it, but rather specific independent organizations that are willing to state that they have the need to share this information. |
thanks for this. maybe @bwprice could comment if this would be useful for the NHM? Paul Eggelton or other social insect experts would be also good to check with but I can't find any on github. |
@wcornwell - I will ask colleagues and update asap. |
Hi @wcornwell,
Have you taken a look at the plant-pollinator vocabulary (
https://ppi.rebipp.org.br/)? It defines the term `caste` and it is supposed
to be used with `dwc:measurementType`.
Please, see:
- Text Guide https://ppi.rebipp.org.br/text/
- The paper describing how to share plant-pollinators interaction data, but
I'm sure you can adapt it to use only the `caste` term as you needed (
https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giac043)
Let me know if I can help you in how to document the `caste` using this
approach.
thanks.
|
Hi @zedomel , Yes, I did have a glance at that when it popped up on google. You have very nice solution here, it seems with bees in mind: I think it's worth discussing with domain experts about whether the same vocabulary could work for all groups of eusocial organisms. Termite castes are a bit more complex compared to bees: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2014.00127/full I'm curious what @bwprice colleagues suggest. |
At the Danish GBIF node DanBIF, there is a need for a "caste" term in at least on sample based dataset on bees. E.g. see https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/1587094318 and the full dataset. I am investigating how caste is treated at the Natural History Museum of Denmark - in Specify. I will post this when known. |
We endorse this addition from SiB Colombia, and we made an inquiry with some of our publishers to review this term, and Dimitri Forero from Instituto de Ciencias Naturales - Universidad Nacional de Colombia say this:
So from SiB Colombia we think that maybe for this term we can put a wide variety of examples, to showcase that every group can use domain specific terms. It can be a sample from several groups, something like: Queen, male alate, intercaste, minor worker, soldier, ergatoid. Also, in usage comments we can put that information explicitly, something like: Recommended best practice is to use a controlled vocabulary, those vocabularies can be domain specific for different eusocial insects. |
New term
Proposed attributes of the new term:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: