distinct values

[techfort]

distinct should be supported out of the box

[obeliskos]

This could possibly be implemented internally via map/reduce. Should be trivial for top level properties (where you just pass in property name), might need recursion for dot notation (in map function).

http://stackoverflow.com/a/10468004

[obeliskos]

Oh save us, github now has emojis. At least they seem somewhat safe right now.

[Simsal]

Hi!
is there any progression on this feature?

[techfort]

@Simsal this week is going to be madness but next week i should be able to get onto this.

[Simsal]

@techfort Sounds great :) wish you a happy coding week ;)

[mirho]

Any progress on adding distinct support? Thanks!

[obeliskos]

If you are really interested and your results are somewhat small you can do something like this in the meantime.

Might take a bit more effort to optimize it across a variety of values and types.

[mirho]

Thanks for the quick response! I will give that a try.

[IrosTheBeggar]

Any update on this? I'm looking from switching from SQLite to Loki and a distinct operation would help a lot

[julien9999]

Hi, is this feature now implemented?

[Viatorus]

For me, these are some open questions:

• How should distinct be used (syntax, code example)?
• Should it be part of the query in find(...) or an extra function call like sort?

[stale]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

[adrienbuffet]

Bump ?

[Wyzix33]

bump ?