Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pod Identity Association missing from Karpenter module #3029

Closed
ryanrf opened this issue May 7, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #3031
Closed

Pod Identity Association missing from Karpenter module #3029

ryanrf opened this issue May 7, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #3031

Comments

@ryanrf
Copy link

ryanrf commented May 7, 2024

More of a question - is there a reason aws_eks_pod_identity_association isn't in the Karpenter module? It looks like the role (and trust relationship) is created, but not the actual pod identity association with a service account. Considering this commit removed Karpenter support in favour of using this module, I was surprised that the submodule for Karpenter does not create the pod identity association. From testing, it doesn't seem like the namespace or service account in the association needs to exist.

Worth mentioning I'm happy to create a PR to add this, but wanted to check if there was a reason it wasn't included. Thanks!

@antonbabenko
Copy link
Member

This issue has been resolved in version 20.10.0 🎉

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 9, 2024

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 9, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants