-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
resource-name
based hostnames
#906
Comments
This is also an issue with new versions of kOps - resource based hostnames are required. I think I might find some time. This looks quite a simple change. |
This issue has been resolved in version 4.0.0 🎉 |
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further. |
This is reopening the closed+locked issues:
Is your request related to a new offering from AWS?
Yes (well; it was, but not really new any more), AWS v3.71.0 added support for
private_dns_hostname_type_on_launch
to the subnet resource.Is your request related to a problem? Please describe.
Yes: I want to be able to launch an
aws_instance
with attached network devices withresource-name
based hostnames.This is currently broken in the provider with the recommended workaround of turning it on by default on the subnet. But this terraform module doesn't expose that option.
Describe the solution you'd like.
Add
private_dns_hostname_type_on_launch
argumentDescribe alternatives you've considered.
Additional context
AWS allows changing the hostname scheme from the legacy ip-based naming to resource-based naming. More info available here
On the provider side this was exposed as
private_dns_hostname_type_on_launch
I expect that
resource-name
based hostnames should eventually be the default going forward, as the previous scheme isn't suitable for an IPv6 world.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: