-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refactor Opswork stack resource to use keyvaluetags package #11373
Conversation
@@ -366,6 +367,16 @@ func resourceAwsOpsworksStackRead(d *schema.ResourceData, meta interface{}) erro | |||
} | |||
resourceAwsOpsworksSetStackCustomCookbooksSource(d, stack.CustomCookbooksSource) | |||
|
|||
tags, err := keyvaluetags.OpsworksListTags(client, arn) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We weren't getting tags in the resource's Read
method previously.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall this is a good change as it helps Terraform perform drift detection for tags (and fixes their import) when the Opsworks Stack is in the same region as the provider, although I worry a little bit about the cross-region abilities of this resource. Going forward tag listing errors for invalid ARNs will now always report. See also: #6381
I'm okay merging this in an effort of moving the resource into a better spot, although this may mean other bug reports similar to #6381 will start coming if the reads start failing now.
ResourceName: resourceName, | ||
ImportState: true, | ||
ImportStateVerify: true, | ||
ImportStateVerifyIgnore: []string{"tags"}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Checking tags
as we now get them in the Read
method.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Left one reply, but looks good to move this resource forward, thanks @ewbankkit 🚀
Output from acceptance testing:
--- PASS: TestAccAWSOpsworksStack_CustomCookbooks_SetPrivateProperties (30.54s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSOpsworksStack_noVpcBasic (31.40s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSOpsworksStack_noVpcCreateTags (39.24s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSOpsworksStack_vpc (40.29s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSOpsWorksStack_classicEndpoints (48.97s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSOpsworksStack_noVpcChangeServiceRoleForceNew (53.44s)
@@ -366,6 +367,16 @@ func resourceAwsOpsworksStackRead(d *schema.ResourceData, meta interface{}) erro | |||
} | |||
resourceAwsOpsworksSetStackCustomCookbooksSource(d, stack.CustomCookbooksSource) | |||
|
|||
tags, err := keyvaluetags.OpsworksListTags(client, arn) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall this is a good change as it helps Terraform perform drift detection for tags (and fixes their import) when the Opsworks Stack is in the same region as the provider, although I worry a little bit about the cross-region abilities of this resource. Going forward tag listing errors for invalid ARNs will now always report. See also: #6381
I'm okay merging this in an effort of moving the resource into a better spot, although this may mean other bug reports similar to #6381 will start coming if the reads start failing now.
This has been released in version 2.44.0 of the Terraform AWS provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. For further feature requests or bug reports with this functionality, please create a new GitHub issue following the template for triage. Thanks! |
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. Thanks! |
Community Note
Relates #10688.
Release note for CHANGELOG:
Output from acceptance testing: