New Data Source: azurerm_network_security_group
#623
Conversation
``` $ acctests azurerm TestAccDataSourceAzureRMNetworkSecurityGroup_ === RUN TestAccDataSourceAzureRMNetworkSecurityGroup_basic --- PASS: TestAccDataSourceAzureRMNetworkSecurityGroup_basic (85.37s) === RUN TestAccDataSourceAzureRMNetworkSecurityGroup_rules --- PASS: TestAccDataSourceAzureRMNetworkSecurityGroup_rules (81.30s) === RUN TestAccDataSourceAzureRMNetworkSecurityGroup_tags --- PASS: TestAccDataSourceAzureRMNetworkSecurityGroup_tags (83.74s) PASS ok github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-azurerm/azurerm 250.432s ```
|
|
||
| * `priority` - The priority of the rule | ||
|
|
||
| * `direction` - The direction specifies if rule will be evaluated on incoming or outgoing traffic. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nitpick, but is there any reason for all the newlines between each attribute?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
not particularly - I copied this over from the resource docs and updated the descriptions (since the schema's the same) - it's mostly just to help readability when writing docs (this doesn't impact the rendering on the website at all). I can consolidate it if you want?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
chatted offline about this, this is 👍 to merge - merging
|
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 hashibot-feedback@hashicorp.com. Thanks! |
ghost
locked and limited conversation to collaborators
As proposed in #621.
Tests pass: