Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suggestion: Allow raw mof input #27

Open
RamblingCookieMonster opened this issue Dec 3, 2016 · 1 comment
Open

Suggestion: Allow raw mof input #27

RamblingCookieMonster opened this issue Dec 3, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

@RamblingCookieMonster
Copy link

RamblingCookieMonster commented Dec 3, 2016

Hi!

I've found a number of processes that use tooling to compile a mof, rather than an intermediary ps1 file. It may be helpful to allow some means to provide an mof file directly, rather than requiring ps1 input.

Presumably, you could look at the configuration_script path to identify this, or use to allow it as an alternative to configuration_script.

I do recognize that in some scenarios it might be preferable to run that tooling directly via shell provisioner, but could see both scenarios being helpful.

If this makes sense, I'd be happy to poke around and try my hand at Ruby : )

Cheers!

@smurawski
Copy link
Contributor

@RamblingCookieMonster If you want to take a crack at it, go for it!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants