You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've found a number of processes that use tooling to compile a mof, rather than an intermediary ps1 file. It may be helpful to allow some means to provide an mof file directly, rather than requiring ps1 input.
Presumably, you could look at the configuration_script path to identify this, or use to allow it as an alternative to configuration_script.
I do recognize that in some scenarios it might be preferable to run that tooling directly via shell provisioner, but could see both scenarios being helpful.
If this makes sense, I'd be happy to poke around and try my hand at Ruby : )
Cheers!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi!
I've found a number of processes that use tooling to compile a mof, rather than an intermediary ps1 file. It may be helpful to allow some means to provide an mof file directly, rather than requiring ps1 input.
Presumably, you could look at the configuration_script path to identify this, or use to allow it as an alternative to configuration_script.
I do recognize that in some scenarios it might be preferable to run that tooling directly via shell provisioner, but could see both scenarios being helpful.
If this makes sense, I'd be happy to poke around and try my hand at Ruby : )
Cheers!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: