-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 467
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
waitFor
doesn't advance time when using jest
fake timers without injecting globals
#1286
Comments
@signorettif May this ussue be relative to this problem? |
Yes! I think that's a symptom of the same underlying problem |
@signorettif is there some updates? |
In the end, it all boils down to whether TL should be open to dependency injection of the advance timers function by our users. I didn't get the change to work on that lately. |
Now we have api, how to share jest.advanceTimersByTime in It would be nice to at least have similar setup option in testing library |
@testing-library/dom
version:9.3.4
jest@29.7.0
jest-environment-jsdom@29.7.0
Relevant Code or Config:
A minimal sandbox to reproduce the issue is available on codesandbox. You can execute tests by opening a terminal and running the
yarn test
command.Actions Undertaken:
jest
to not inject globals (--injectGlobals=false
); refer to thepackage.json
command from the sandbox above.waitFor
orwaitForElementToBeRemoved
.Outcome:
waitFor
never advances timers by time (the default50ms
interval of the loop or any other interval), causing the tests to exceed their timeout.Reproduction:
You can reproduce this issue via the following codesandbox link.
Problem Description:
When using
jest
, but without injecting globals, thewaitFor
logic:jest
's environment in thejestFakeTimersAreEnabled
predicate.jest
global object, which is undefined when not injecting globals. This would lead to an error when attempting to invokejest.advanceTimersByTime
.On a broader scope (although I want to keep this issue's focus narrow for the sake of actionability), there might be other unintended implicit assumptions about depending on (a)
jest
and / or (b) a test environment that injects globals. The following issues are related, although they focus on different manifested problems:Suggested Solution:
jest
environment detection) can be resolved by adding anOR
condition to thejestFakeTimersAreEnabled
predicate. In my experience, we should add a check forprocess.env.JEST_WORKER_ID
to not beundefined
.jest
from@jest/globals
when (a) we detect aJEST_WORKER_ID
and (b) we know fake timers are enabled.dom-testing-library
should depend on@jest/globals
.@jest/globals
in this case, but I think it might provide the best developer experience for end users.Depending on the appetite for this issue to be fixed, I might work on a PR to address the above. I am somewhat surprised this hasn't come up before, but I guess not many people tend to set up
jest
without injecting globals.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: