Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

harmonize different coordinate systems - gff 1[start,end] vs bed 0[start,end) #33

Closed
thackl opened this issue Feb 2, 2021 · 0 comments
Closed

harmonize different coordinate systems - gff 1[start,end] vs bed 0[start,end) #33

thackl opened this issue Feb 2, 2021 · 0 comments
Assignees
@thackl
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@thackl
Copy link
Owner

thackl commented Feb 2, 2021

gggenomes tables use 1[start,end]-based coordinates with start < end and strand given by "+/-", but some annotation files such as bed are 0[start,end)-based. Need to take care of that on import.
@thackl thackl self-assigned this Feb 2, 2021
@thackl thackl added improvement Improve API/behavior/implementation of an existing feature bug Something isn't working and removed improvement Improve API/behavior/implementation of an existing feature labels Feb 2, 2021
@thackl thackl closed this as completed in 4e378e7 Feb 7, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@thackl thackl

Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@thackl