-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 55
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
tedge config set mqtt.BROKERURL not provided #520
Comments
I have a mix feeling here.
So I don't see that as a long term solution.
|
The reason for the request ist that some of the customers already do have and use their own MQTT Broker. In terms of management its thus easier to use the existing one instead of needing another one just for thin-edge. I do agree that in terms of security and e.g. credential handling some design effort is needed. However this scenario does happen out in the field. |
Connecting to an MQTT broker deployed independently is definitely something that should be feasible. |
Is the function tedge config set mqtt.external.bind_address meant for that? |
The
|
Could you point us to the files where this needs to be added, we would fork here probably. We searched for "mqtt.port" and did find out that these settings seems to be done in several rust files such that it was not clear to us where to add that function in detail. @didier-wenzek: mqtt_options.broker_address("IP"); Would that do the trick? |
If you wish to add this feature, I see two approaches. Add a
|
Good news, this is solved by #1773. The feature has been merged into main already, and is under official verification. |
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
We tried an multi container setup where MQTT Broker and sedge-mapper are running in two different containers. Within the mapper the MQTT Broker address can not be configured.
Describe the solution you'd like
Use mqtt.url= as a new key value pair for config.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: