-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enhance Node Finder experience #2129
Comments
Related to: |
work in progress(WIP) the horizontal filter was designed to take 15% of the screen and by default closed, but while we have many items to filter we need to back to put it on the left side @MohamedElmdary suggest to give the user the option to hide the sidebar at pages contain filter( Node Finder,dedicated-nodes,farm-finder) so we can have more space for filter Note: that'll cause scroll at the table on small screen |
screen-capture.23.webm |
After discussing it with @ehab-hassan we agreed that it would be better for the apply button to be at the top and reorder the filter with most useful first (so the user scrolling would be minimal). The order is:
|
verified on devnet
nodes are now in cards which is better for small screens and no need for horizontal scrolling. toggles now only take action after clicking on apply Screen.Recording.2024-04-07.at.9.06.41.AM.mov |
Filters take almost 100vh from the viewport and user needs to scroll to see the table.
Suggested solution: Let's use compact filter input instead. Also, not all filters should be shown to the user. Some should be shown as default and the others can be added if the user needs (from a dropdown menu or sth).
Reduce columns in nodes table. Users can access additional details by clicking on individual table rows anyway.
Display node type hints above the table instead of below it. With a pagination setting of 50 items per page, placing this information below the table would require excessive scrolling for the user.
Related Issues:
node finder
and from selecting node while deploying any solution #2056node finder
. #2285The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: