Can't get the result of the public ip validation

[AhmedHanafy725]

Env: devnet
nodeId: 12

Steps

• Get public ip validation test result through RMB call zos.perf.get_all.

Result

no result was found on node 12 (the node with the smallest ID and up state) as node 11 is down (the last updateAt for node 11 Tuesday, November 14, 2023 12:54:12 PM GMT)

{ name: 'PublicIPValidation', timestamp: 1700028002, result: null },

Expectations

as node 11 has been down since yesterday, I was expecting to see the public ip validation result on node 12.

[muhamadazmy]

Seems that node 12 still thinks that there is another node that should do the tests. Maybe it doesn't take into account if the node is not up anymore.

@AbdelrahmanElawady can you please take a look why that is

[muhamadazmy]

@Omarabdul3ziz please update this issue.

[Omarabdul3ziz]

updated the node status decision part, to use graphql client instead of directly calling the chain.

[khaledyoussef24]

issue is not producible any more

 "description": "Runs on the least NodeID node in a farm to validate all its IPs.",
    "name": "public-ip-validation",
    "result": {
      "185.206.122.16/24": {
        "reason": "ip is already assigned to a contract",
        "state": "skipped"
      },
      "185.206.122.17/24": {
        "reason": "ip is already assigned to a contract",
        "state": "skipped"
      },
      "185.206.122.18/24": {
        "reason": "ip is already assigned to a contract",
        "state": "skipped"
      },
      "185.206.122.19/24": {
        "reason": "ip is already assigned to a contract",
        "state": "skipped"
      },
      "185.206.122.20/24": {
        "reason": "ip is already assigned to a contract",
        "state": "skipped"
      },
      "185.206.122.21/24": {
        "reason": "ip is already assigned to a contract",
        "state": "skipped"
      },
      "185.206.122.22/24": {
        "reason": "ip is already assigned to a contract",
        "state": "skipped"
      },
      "185.206.122.23/24": {
        "reason": "ip is already assigned to a contract",
        "state": "skipped"
      },
      "185.206.122.24/24": {
        "reason": "",
        "state": "valid"
      },
      "185.206.122.25/24": {
        "reason": "",
        "state": "valid"
      },
      "185.206.122.26/24": {
        "reason": "ip is already assigned to a contract",
        "state": "skipped"
      },
      "185.206.122.27/24": {
        "reason": "ip is already assigned to a contract",
        "state": "skipped"
      },
      "185.206.122.28/24": {
        "reason": "ip is already assigned to a contract",
        "state": "skipped"
      },
      "185.206.122.29/24": {
        "reason": "ip is already assigned to a contract",
        "state": "skipped"
      },
      "185.206.122.30/24": {
        "reason": "",
        "state": "valid"
      },
      "185.206.122.33/24": {
        "reason": "ip is already assigned to a contract",
        "state": "skipped"
      },
      "185.206.122.34/24": {
        "reason": "ip is already assigned to a contract",
        "state": "skipped"
      },
      "185.206.122.35/24": {
        "reason": "ip is already assigned to a contract",
        "state": "skipped"
      },
      "185.206.122.36/24": {
        "reason": "ip is already assigned to a contract",
        "state": "skipped"
      },
      "185.206.122.37/24": {
        "reason": "ip is already assigned to a contract",
        "state": "skipped"
      },
      "185.206.122.38/24": {
        "reason": "ip is already assigned to a contract",
        "state": "skipped"
      },
      "185.206.122.39/24": {
        "reason": "ip is already assigned to a contract",
        "state": "skipped"
      },
      "185.206.122.40/24": {
        "reason": "ip is already assigned to a contract",
        "state": "skipped"
      },
      "185.206.122.41/24": {
        "reason": "ip is already assigned to a contract",
        "state": "skipped"
      },
      "185.206.122.42/24": {
        "reason": "ip is already assigned to a contract",
        "state": "skipped"
      },
      "185.206.122.43/24": {
        "reason": "ip is already assigned to a contract",
        "state": "skipped"
      },
      "185.206.122.44/24": {
        "reason": "ip is already assigned to a contract",
        "state": "skipped"
      },
      "185.206.122.45/24": {
        "reason": "ip is already assigned to a contract",
        "state": "skipped"
      },
      "185.206.122.46/24": {
        "reason": "ip is already assigned to a contract",
        "state": "skipped"
      },
      "185.206.122.47/24": {
        "reason": "ip is already assigned to a contract",
        "state": "skipped"
      },
      "185.206.122.48/24": {
        "reason": "ip is already assigned to a contract",
        "state": "skipped"
      },
      "185.206.122.49/24": {
        "reason": "ip is already assigned to a contract",
        "state": "skipped"
      },
      "185.206.122.50/24": {
        "reason": "ip is already assigned to a contract",
        "state": "skipped"
      },
      "185.206.122.51/24": {
        "reason": "",
        "state": "valid"
      },
      "185.206.122.52/24": {
        "reason": "",
        "state": "valid"
      }

tried this and compared some random nodes with graphql queries and validated that they have the same results