Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for TimePlus (proton) #60

Open
syepes opened this issue Jun 4, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Add support for TimePlus (proton) #60

syepes opened this issue Jun 4, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@syepes
Copy link

syepes commented Jun 4, 2024

It would be great to add support for TimePlus: https://github.com/timeplus-io/proton-java-driver/tree/develop/proton-jdbc

@ryanhamilton
Copy link
Collaborator

@jovezhong - To add a connector takes time as I need to spin up an instance, create many different types of data and test it all works. Could you commit to:
a) Providing a script to return as many types as possible for testing?
b) I will then test it and iterate to ensure it works.
c) You would then publish a link from your website and on one social media channel?

It's just I don't want to add support without having some real users lined up to test it and use it in future.
I mean your web UI looks excellent 👍 Great work 👍 so it's probably less useful to your particular users.

@jovezhong
Copy link

Thank you, @syepes for opening this ticket. He is a real user of Timeplus :) Maybe Sebastian can share more about the use case of QStudio with Timeplus.

I also created a PR Nov last year timestored/pulseui#139 using the JDBC driver. Maybe we can work on that first.

@syepes
Copy link
Author

syepes commented Jun 6, 2024

I am currently using DBeaver as it allows the creation of custom connection types, but the UX experience of this tool is not the greatest and I would prefer using qStudio :-)

I also tried copying the jar in the libs working directory, but could not set it working.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants