We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
do is correctly highlighted in a do … end block. However, when we use its short version, do looses its color:
do
do … end
It's then parsed as a named parameter (keyword list), which it is, but it's still the do block and IMHO should be highlighted as such.
Thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm going to bump this up.
def myFun(n), do: "num is #{n}"
That's totally valid and very common. Should be an easy change in the syntax config.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
do
is correctly highlighted in ado … end
block.However, when we use its short version,
do
looses its color:It's then parsed as a named parameter (keyword list), which it is, but it's still the
do
block and IMHO should be highlighted as such.Thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: