-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 79
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
support ipxe scripts over data uris in ipxe script urls #194
Conversation
set packet_facility test.facility | ||
set packet_plan test.slug | ||
|
||
echo my data uri script |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The test fails, with this line being a chain-url line, referencing the unexpanded data uri.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you paste the test failure here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm rerunning the test to capture the log output.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
--- FAIL: TestIpxeScript (0.00s)
--- FAIL: TestIpxeScript/installer:_ipxe_data_url (0.00s)
main_test.go:172:
Error Trace: main_test.go:172
Error: Not equal:
expected: "#!ipxe\n\n\nparams\nparam body Device connected to DHCP system\nparam type provisioning.104.01\nimgfetch ${tinkerbell}/phone-home##params\nimgfree\n\nset packet_facility test.facility\nset packet_plan test.slug\n\necho my data uri script\n"
actual : "#!ipxe\n\n\nparams\nparam body Device connected to DHCP system\nparam type provisioning.104.01\nimgfetch ${tinkerbell}/phone-home##params\nimgfree\n\nset packet_facility test.facility\nset packet_plan test.slug\nchain --autofree data:text/plain;charset=utf-8;base64,ZWNobyBteSBkYXRhIHVyaSBzY3JpcHQ=\n"
Diff:
--- Expected
+++ Actual
@@ -11,4 +11,3 @@
set packet_plan test.slug
+chain --autofree data:text/plain;charset=utf-8;base64,ZWNobyBteSBkYXRhIHVyaSBzY3JpcHQ=
-echo my data uri script
-
Test: TestIpxeScript/installer:_ipxe_data_url
{"level":"error","ts":1637329705.027709,"caller":"custom_ipxe/main.go:54","msg":"validating ipxe config","service":"github.com/tinkerbell/boots","error":"ipxe config URL or Script must be defined"}
FAIL
@displague still working this one? |
@jeremytanner I would like to see this work continued for #110. I am stalled on it. @jacobweinstock do you see what I'd like to have here (based on the test)? Is this the right place for this change and tests? |
Hey @displague, apologies for the lack of response here. I will put this on my priority list for this week/next and update here when I have something concrete to provide. Again, sorry for the delay. |
:( still haven't got around to this quite yet. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Minor comments.
installers/custom_ipxe/main.go
Outdated
@@ -30,6 +31,9 @@ func ipxeScript(j job.Job, s *ipxe.Script) { | |||
} | |||
} else if strings.HasPrefix(j.UserData(), "#!ipxe") { | |||
cfg = &packet.InstallerData{Script: j.UserData()} | |||
} else if dataURL, err := dataurl.DecodeString(j.IPXEScriptURL()); err == nil { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
optional: at this level of complexity, this would be better off being refactored as a switch{}
statement. Feel free to leave this for a future refactor.
PR overall looks good - is it just stuck on there being a failing test? |
Signed-off-by: Marques Johansson <mjohansson@equinix.com>
69961fe
to
17c2756
Compare
Based on comment history it looks like this one is still awaiting @jacobweinstock to prioritize and review. Assigning failing test label based on description |
@displague more rebasing for you |
@displague, looks like this is still in draft and has some merge conflicts. will wait for updates before reviewing? |
The code base has moved on quite a bit. Feel free to reopen. |
Description
from #192 (comment)
Why is this needed
Fixes: #110
How Has This Been Tested?
Tests are failing, I haven't looked into how to fix this yet. I think the existing mocks may not be sufficient.
How are existing users impacted? What migration steps/scripts do we need?
Checklist:
I have: