You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently APIs such as Ptr.atContents and System.file{Read,Write}K assume the input will be an Array<byte>. Changing to a Range<byte> would make it more general.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I have done some work on this recently, e.g. Pointer.atContents can work with ranges now.
For the built-in System component, I was thinking of adding new methods that take a Range<byte> and then deprecating the old ones. This requires a stable rev, as they must first be introduced into v3i and then (with the Pointer.atContents change above integrated into stable) added the native implementations after the rev.
Yes that makes sense. Sorry for being AWOL again -- just have too many deadlines. Will be more free after mid-April. Might try my hand at making an LSP server again.
Currently APIs such as
Ptr.atContents
andSystem.file{Read,Write}K
assume the input will be anArray<byte>
. Changing to aRange<byte>
would make it more general.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: