We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I’ve never needed typesDescription myself. It causes issues (jsdoctypeparser/jsdoctypeparser#15).
typesDescription
How about allowing to opt out of it with a new flag? We could also make --raw imply that we don’t want the typesDescription.
--raw
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
I’ve never needed
typesDescription
myself. It causes issues (jsdoctypeparser/jsdoctypeparser#15).How about allowing to opt out of it with a new flag? We could also make
--raw
imply that we don’t want thetypesDescription
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: